Now that ‘Michael’, the biopic on Michael Jackson, has officially released in theatres on April 24, 2026, the conversation around it has only grown louder.

Directed by Antoine Fuqua and starring Jaafar Jackson, the film traces Jackson’s journey from his Jackson 5 beginnings to his rise as one of the most influential performers in music history. But even after release, it is not just the music or performances people are talking about. It is what the film chooses to leave out.

What story does the film actually tell?

Instead of covering every chapter of Jackson’s life, ‘Michael’ focuses on his early years and artistic rise. It opens with his childhood under the strict guidance of his father Joe Jackson, played by Colman Domingo.

From there, it tracks his transformation into a solo superstar, recreating major moments such as Thriller, the Bad era and his iconic stage performances. The tone leans heavily into music, spectacle and emotional family dynamics.

Why are people calling it controversial?

The biggest talking point is not what is shown, but what is missing.

Even after release, critics continue to point out that the film avoids addressing the sexual abuse allegations that have followed Jackson’s legacy for decades. Reviews have described it as a “sanitised” version of his life, focusing more on his artistry than on the darker controversies.

Supporters, including members of the Jackson family, argue that the film offers a chance to look at the artist beyond the media narrative.

Did legal issues shape the final film?

Yes, and quite significantly.

Reports confirm that earlier versions of the film did include references to the 1993 allegations. However, a clause in a 1994 settlement reportedly prevented any depiction or mention of Jordan Chandler, which forced major changes.

This led to extensive reshoots and edits before release, ultimately removing those portions from the final cut.

As a result, the film ends around the late 1980s, before those controversies became public.

How has the film been received?

The response has been sharply divided.

While critics have given mixed to negative reviews, praising Jaafar Jackson’s performance but criticising the lack of depth, audiences have responded far more positively. The film has also performed strongly at the box office, signalling that public interest remains high.

What is the Jackson family saying?

The family itself is split in its reaction.

Some members, including Taj Jackson and TJ Jackson, have openly supported the film, saying it gives a fuller picture of who Michael was beyond headlines.

Others are less convinced. Paris Jackson has reportedly criticised the film, calling it “sugar-coated” and claiming it includes inaccuracies. She has also said she had no real involvement in the project.

Janet Jackson is also said to have raised concerns privately, while Katherine Jackson has reportedly reacted more positively.

Is this about reshaping his legacy?

That is the bigger question the film has raised.

Some critics believe ‘Michael’ is part of a broader attempt to present Jackson primarily as a musical genius, keeping controversies outside the frame.

Others argue that his influence on music, dance and global pop culture deserves to be celebrated without reducing his life to allegations alone.

The big question: Will there be a sequel?

There is already talk of a follow-up film.

With ‘Michael’ focusing mainly on his early years, there is speculation that a second instalment could explore the later, more controversial chapters of his life. Even members of the cast have hinted that the story may not be complete yet.