New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday ruled that fresh law graduates will no longer be eligible to appear for judicial services examinations, making a minimum of three years’ legal practice a mandatory qualification for entry-level posts.

The judgement, delivered by a bench comprising Chief Justice B. R. Gavai and Justice Augustine George Masih, is expected to have far-reaching implications for aspiring members of the judiciary.

In its ruling, the court stressed the importance of courtroom experience for those entering the judicial system. “The appointment of fresh law graduates has led to several difficulties, as noted by multiple High Courts,” said Chief Justice Gavai. “Practical experience in court is essential for ensuring judicial efficiency and competence.”

The decision mandates that candidates must have at least three years of legal practice before they can sit the examination for entry-level civil judge posts in the lower judiciary.

The ruling came in response to a plea filed by the All India Judges Association, which raised concerns about the preparedness and effectiveness of appointing judges directly from law school, without any hands-on experience.

Chief Justice Gavai noted that various High Courts had reported practical challenges stemming from the direct recruitment of fresh graduates into the judiciary. These concerns were taken into account by the bench in reaching its conclusion.

The detailed judgment is expected to be released soon.