Legal opinion raises serious concerns about the judge`s impartiality in the actress assault case. Was the verdict influenced?

Kochi: A legal opinion has made serious remarks against the trial court judge in the actress assault case. The judge is under a cloud of suspicion in the memory card leak case. Therefore, the judge was not fit to deliver a verdict, the legal opinion states. The prosecution alleges that the judgment was prepared with the intention of acquitting Dileep and that evidence against the actor was not properly considered. A detailed note by Special Prosecutor V Ajith Kumar is also part of the legal opinion.
In December last year, the court had acquitted Dileep, eighth accused in the case. The court held that the conspiracy against Dileep could not be proven. At the same time, it found that the charges against accused one to six were proven and sentenced them to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment. The verdict was delivered by Ernakulam Principal Sessions Judge Honey M Varghese.
The incident in question took place on February 17, 2017. The actress was travelling from Thrissur to Ernakulam for a shoot when, according to the prosecution, she was abducted on contract and obscene visuals were recorded. The trial began in 2018.
Published: 08 Jan 2026, 10:13 am IST
Related Topics
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Get Latest Mathrubhumi Updates in English
Disclaimer: Kindly avoid objectionable, derogatory, unlawful and lewd comments, while responding to reports. Such comments are punishable under cyber laws. Please keep away from personal attacks. The opinions expressed here are the personal opinions of readers and not that of Mathrubhumi.

