There is no denying that ‘Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups’ looks like a film made with enormous ambition. From its elaborate production design to Rajeev Ravi’s striking cinematography, Geetu Mohandas’ gangster drama creates a world that is visually rich, dark and deliberately larger than life. Yash, returning to the big screen four years after the ‘KGF’ films, gets the kind of introduction that fans have been waiting for, and the film repeatedly finds ways to turn his presence into spectacle.

But ‘Toxic’ is also a frustrating case of style overwhelming substance. For a film that spends so much time building its world, characters and mythology, it struggles to give the audience a strong emotional reason to invest in them. At 3 hours and 14 minutes, the runtime becomes one of its biggest obstacles, particularly when several sequences feel as though they could have been removed without affecting the larger narrative.

Directed by Geetu Mohandas and co-written by Geetu and Yash, ‘Toxic’ is set against the criminal underworld of Goa between the 1950s and 1970s. Yash plays Raya and his estranged son Rumi, also known as Ticket, while Kiara Advani, Nayanthara, Huma Qureshi, Tara Sutaria and Rukmini Vasanth form part of the sprawling ensemble. Backed by KVN Productions and Monster Mind Creations, the film reportedly carries a budget of around Rs 500 crore and was released on August 26, 2026.

A world that looks better than the story

The strongest argument in favour of ‘Toxic’ is its filmmaking craft. The film has an unmistakable visual identity, with its period setting, moody lighting, detailed production design and stylised action giving it a distinctive texture.

Rajeev Ravi's camera work is particularly impressive. The retro production design, dimly lit interiors, period streets and large-scale action sequences are composed with a confidence that makes several frames look like standalone pieces of visual art. The film clearly wants to create a heightened version of its criminal world rather than present a straightforward gangster story, and technically, that ambition often pays off.

The action is similarly designed for maximum impact. Yash's introduction delivers the expected mass elevation, while a lengthy pre-interval shootout provides one of the film's most effective theatrical moments. The background score also works best when the film lets its violence and action take centre stage.

The problem is that ‘Toxic’ often seems more interested in how a scene looks than in why it needs to exist.

Also Read: Toxic fees revealed? Here’s how much Yash, Kiara Advani and Nayanthara reportedly earn

Yash owns the screen, but the film does not always use him well

Yash remains the film's biggest asset. Whether playing the older Raya or Rumi, he brings the swagger, physicality and intensity expected from a star of his stature. His screen presence is particularly effective during the action portions, where even familiar mass moments acquire weight simply because of the way he carries them.

The dual-role premise also gives him enough room to explore contrasting shades. Yet the screenplay does not always extract the maximum value from that opportunity. There are stretches where the spectacle surrounding Yash becomes more compelling than the character himself.

Kiara Advani makes a strong impression and gets some of the film's more emotionally demanding moments. Nayanthara brings authority and presence to her role, while Huma Qureshi has fun with a colder, more calculating character. However, the women in the story, including Tara Sutaria and Rukmini Vasanth, are not given character arcs substantial enough to match the scale of the ensemble.

With such a formidable cast assembled, ‘Toxic’ occasionally leaves the impression that it has more actors than characters who genuinely need to be there.

The screenplay takes too long to find its pulse

The film's opening section demands patience. Its non-linear storytelling, large cast and layered criminal network take considerable time to settle into place. There is an obvious attempt to create mystery around the characters and their connections, but the prolonged setup comes at the expense of momentum.

Once the narrative gets going, the pattern becomes increasingly familiar: a dramatic passage gives way to violence, which is followed by another dramatic passage and another action sequence. Individually, some of these moments work. But together, they create a sense of repetition.

The issue becomes even more apparent in the second half. The story does eventually begin to reveal what it has been building towards, and some of the thematic ideas become clearer towards the closing stretch. But by then, the film has already tested the audience's patience.

There is a compelling story buried somewhere inside ‘Toxic’. The problem is that the film takes far too long to uncover it.

Also Read: ‘Won't do it for free...’ Yash reacts to ‘condom ad’ jibes over ‘Tabaahi’

When the film reaches for meaning

The final portion makes an earnest attempt to give the violence and chaos a deeper emotional and philosophical meaning. Symbolism and poetic imagery enter the picture, suggesting that the filmmakers want the story to be read as something more than a conventional gangster revenge drama.

It is an interesting instinct, but the execution does not completely land.

Instead of making the preceding events feel more meaningful, the climax can come across as overly elaborate and, at points, unintentionally amusing. The emotional payoff that the film appears to be chasing never reaches the required intensity. By this stage, the excessive runtime has also made the pacing harder to overlook.

The climax is therefore less of a culmination and more of a reminder of what the film could have achieved with a tighter screenplay.

A gangster film caught between spectacle and substance

There are clear echoes of contemporary Indian gangster cinema in ‘Toxic’, and its combination of stylised violence, larger-than-life characters and dark themes can sometimes feel like several familiar cinematic influences being pushed through a psychedelic filter.

But imitation is not necessarily the problem. The bigger concern is that ‘Toxic’ does not always find enough of its own emotional grounding beneath the surface.

Its violence can be excessive, some fights feel dramatically unnecessary, and several sequences appear designed primarily to maintain the film's visual and tonal identity rather than move the story forward. The result is a movie that frequently impresses on a technical level while leaving the audience emotionally detached.

Watch trailer:

Verdict

‘Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups’ is an ambitious film that looks expensive, feels grand and gives Yash several opportunities to demonstrate why he remains one of Indian cinema's biggest mass stars. Its cinematography, production design, action choreography and performances provide enough moments to admire.

Yet admiration does not always translate into engagement.

At times, ‘Toxic’ feels caught between the mass-driven grammar of ‘KGF’ and the darker, more indulgent world of ‘Anima’l. It borrows the former's larger-than-life gangster spectacle and the latter's appetite for violence, excess and morally murky characters, but struggles to fuse those influences into something emotionally cohesive of its own.

‘Toxic’ wants to be a violent gangster epic, a stylised fairy tale and an emotional family drama at once. It occasionally succeeds at being spectacular. What it struggles to become is compelling.

Rating: 2/5