
A confidential directive enforced by the United States government has banned all American government personnel stationed in China—including family members and contractors with security clearance—from engaging in romantic or sexual relationships with Chinese citizens, The Associated Press has reported. The AP learned this from four individuals familiar with the matter. The move was initiated by then-ambassador Nicholas Burns in January before his departure.
While select US agencies already imposed relationship restrictions, the AP report highlights that this is the first blanket “non-fraternisation” policy in China since the Cold War. A limited version had existed earlier, targeting only those working at US diplomatic missions. Burns' directive broadened this to include all Chinese citizens within China.
Where does the policy apply?
According to the AP, the policy applies across US diplomatic missions in mainland China and Hong Kong. It excludes personnel posted outside China. Only those with existing relationships may seek exemptions—failure to comply results in immediate repatriation.
Why was the policy introduced?
The AP report suggests mounting concerns in Washington over espionage threats. The House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party reportedly raised the issue with Burns. American personnel are routinely warned about “honeypot” tactics by Chinese intelligence agencies.
What are the implications?
The AP notes that the policy has not been publicly announced and was conveyed internally. It mirrors past Cold War-era restrictions and reflects deepening US-China tensions. Beijing’s own rules similarly prohibit its officials from maintaining intimate relations with foreigners.
Published: 05 Apr 2025, 12:10 pm IST
Related Topics
Get Latest Mathrubhumi Updates in English
Disclaimer: Kindly avoid objectionable, derogatory, unlawful and lewd comments, while responding to reports. Such comments are punishable under cyber laws. Please keep away from personal attacks. The opinions expressed here are the personal opinions of readers and not that of Mathrubhumi.

