Is someone watching your every move? Inside the controversial world of gang stalking

Imagine walking down a street and noticing a stranger who appears to know something about your private life. A conversation you had at home seems to be reflected in an unexpected encounter. Someone appears to know your travel plans, the places you visit or the people you communicate with. As such incidents accumulate, you begin to wonder whether someone is watching your every move.

This is the kind of experience described by people who believe they are victims of gang stalking, a controversial phenomenon involving allegations of coordinated surveillance, intimidation and psychological harassment by multiple individuals.

Also Read | 'Your phone could be hacked without a single click': Inside the mind of a hacker

Unlike conventional stalking, which typically involves an identifiable person repeatedly following or harassing someone, gang stalking is described by those reporting it as a broader campaign involving strangers, acquaintances or organised groups. Individuals who report these experiences often believe that apparently unrelated incidents are part of a deliberate effort to monitor, frighten or isolate them.

The phenomenon has attracted attention in online communities and academic research, particularly because of the psychological distress reported by those who believe they are being targeted. However, researchers have cautioned that gang stalking, as commonly described, is not an established form of organised persecution. Studies have frequently linked such accounts to persecutory beliefs, while recognising that the distress experienced by those reporting them can be severe.

A 2020 study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, which examined 50 online accounts of alleged gang stalking, identified recurring experiences involving perceived surveillance, following, interference and intimidation. The researchers also documented significant psychological consequences among those reporting such experiences.

The study, however, analysed subjective accounts rather than independently establishing that coordinated harassment had occurred.

How technology enters the picture

The growing availability of digital surveillance tools has added another dimension to concerns about stalking and harassment.

Smartphones, location-sharing applications, spyware, compromised online accounts, and connected devices can expose sensitive information about an individual’s movements, conversations and daily activities.

Technology-facilitated stalking is a documented form of abuse. The Stalking Prevention, Awareness, and Resource Center (SPARC) in the United States identifies mobile phones, computers, messaging applications, tracking devices and smart-home technologies among the tools that can be misused to monitor or intimidate individuals.

Such surveillance does not always require sophisticated hacking skills. Someone who gains unauthorised access to an email account, messaging service or location-sharing application may be able to obtain information that the affected person considers private.

Stalkerware, a category of software designed to secretly monitor another person’s device, can also expose messages, photographs, location information and other personal data. According to the Coalition Against Stalkerware, these applications can allow an individual to monitor another person’s digital activities without their knowledge or consent.

However, the existence of such technologies does not establish that a person reporting gang stalking is being monitored. Determining whether surveillance has occurred requires verifiable evidence.

When ordinary encounters become frightening

One of the defining features of gang stalking accounts is the belief that seemingly ordinary incidents are connected. A stranger standing near someone’s workplace, a vehicle repeatedly appearing on a familiar route or an unexpected encounter in a public place may be interpreted as part of a coordinated campaign.

For someone who believes their private communications have been compromised, even a minor coincidence can become deeply unsettling.

Researchers studying gang stalking narratives have found that individuals frequently describe a cumulative pattern of incidents rather than a single identifiable threat.

A 2021 study published in JMIR Mental Health examined videos posted online by people identifying themselves as victims of gang stalking. The researchers found that participants often interpreted everyday interactions as evidence of a wider network of individuals acting against them. The study also highlighted how online communities can reinforce shared interpretations of such experiences.

An ethical hacker’s encounter with gang stalking allegations

Speaking to Mathrubhumi English, ethical hacker Benild Joseph recalled an unusual complaint he received approximately eight years ago from an Indian IT professional working in Bengaluru.

The man claimed that unknown individuals were continuously monitoring him and somehow obtaining information about his private activities.

“He claimed that someone had been continuously monitoring and stalking him. He said he had completely lost his privacy and that unknown people somehow knew everything he was doing,” Joseph said.

Joseph initially found the allegations difficult to believe, particularly the man’s suspicion that ordinary electrical sockets and adapters were being used to monitor him.

Years later, another individual contacted Joseph on behalf of the same man, prompting him to revisit the allegations.

The IT professional, who had subsequently moved to the United States, claimed that the experience had become so distressing that he frequently changed accommodation and sometimes worked from his parked car.

One incident particularly caught Joseph’s attention.

The man alleged that after booking a flight to India, he discovered a printed copy of his flight ticket beneath his car’s windshield wiper the following morning.

“He said that one evening, he booked a flight ticket to India. After making the reservation, he went to sleep. The following morning, when he approached his car, he allegedly found a printed copy of his flight ticket placed under the windshield wiper,” Joseph recalled.

The individual also described other encounters that he believed were connected to the suspected surveillance.

Joseph, however, emphasised that he could not independently verify the incidents or establish any connection between them.

Could strangers be recruited to intimidate someone?

Joseph suggested that digital platforms could potentially be used to arrange harassment through individuals who might not even understand the larger purpose of their actions.

“One possibility I have considered is that such harassment could be arranged remotely using online groups where people are paid for small tasks, such as on Telegram,” he explained.

He illustrated the possibility with a hypothetical situation involving a person planning a private birthday celebration at a resort.

If someone had unlawfully accessed that person’s communications, an organiser could potentially instruct a stranger to stand at a traffic signal displaying the resort’s name.

The stranger might consider it an ordinary paid assignment, without knowing anything about the individual concerned.

However, someone who believed their birthday plans were confidential could interpret the encounter as evidence that their private activities were being monitored.

Repeated incidents of this kind, Joseph suggested, could create significant psychological distress.

His explanation describes a hypothetical method of intimidation, not a verified gang stalking operation.

The psychological consequences

Whether harassment is established or only perceived, persistent fear of being monitored can have serious consequences.

People reporting gang stalking experiences frequently describe anxiety, sleep disturbances, social withdrawal, difficulty concentrating and disruptions to their professional and personal lives.

A 2015 study published in The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology examined complaints of group stalking and found substantially greater psychological distress among those reporting group stalking than among respondents describing individual stalking.

The researchers concluded that the group-stalking accounts examined were likely rooted in delusional beliefs, while emphasising that the associated suffering and disruption were significant.

This distinction is important. Genuine cyberstalking and technology-assisted harassment are recognised threats, but allegations involving large, unidentified networks require independent investigation rather than automatic acceptance.

At the same time, dismissing every concern about surveillance without examining available evidence risks overlooking actual privacy violations.

The challenge of proving digital harassment

One of the difficulties in investigating suspected technology-assisted harassment is establishing whether private information has actually been accessed.

Digital evidence may include unauthorised account logins, suspicious applications, unexpected location-sharing activity, threatening communications or records showing repeated unwanted contact.

Cybersecurity investigations can sometimes establish whether a device or online account has been compromised. However, such findings cannot automatically explain unrelated encounters or prove the existence of a coordinated stalking network.

The distinction between documented surveillance, suspected harassment and interpretations of coincidental events is therefore essential.

As more aspects of daily life move online, the potential misuse of personal information remains a legitimate concern.