Kerala HC to watch ‘The Kerala Story 2’ ahead of Friday release amidst row

The Kerala High Court has raised serious questions regarding the certification of the controversial upcoming film, 'The Kerala Story 2 - Goes Beyond', warning that its portrayal of the state could "incite passion" and disturb communal harmony.

During a hearing on Tuesday, Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas considered three petitions seeking a stay on the film’s release. The petitioners argue that the movie—slated for release on Friday—misrepresents the secular fabric of Kerala and risks stoking religious tension.

‘Kerala lives in total harmony’

Justice Thomas challenged the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) on its decision to clear the film, specifically noting the state’s reputation for pluralism. According to a report by Bar and Bench, the judge remarked:

"Kerala is so secular. It lives with total harmony but have you considered this when something is portrayed as happening all over the state? There is a wrong indication and can even incite passion and that is when the censor board (CBFC) comes in picture."

The court noted that the film’s claim of being "inspired by true events" carries significant weight and potentially justifies the public's anxieties. Justice Thomas observed that because the film explicitly uses the name 'Kerala' in its title, the apprehensions of its citizens cannot be brushed aside.

"Apprehensions of people in Kerala cannot be ignored because you have given the name Kerala," the judge said. "Normally, I do not interfere with any movie because it is a creation of an art but then you say it is inspired by true events and named it Kerala, which can create some communal tension."

Limits of artistic freedom

While acknowledging the importance of creative liberty, the court reminded the CBFC of its own guidelines, which prohibit content that is contemptuous of religious or racial groups. Justice Thomas reiterated that while he remains reluctant to interfere with artistic expression, legal restrictions must be considered when religious matters are involved.

In a temporary concession, the senior advocate representing the film’s producers agreed to withdraw all current teasers until the court delivers its final verdict. The producers also offered to arrange a private screening for the judge to view the film in its entirety before a decision is reached.

The matter was adjourned for further hearing later that afternoon.