UGC, NCERT controversies ‘avoidable’, says Dharmendra Pradhan amid court scrutiny

New Delhi: Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan has said the recent controversies involving UGC equity regulations and an NCERT textbook were “avoidable”, acknowledging concerns over how the issues were presented. With both matters currently under the review of the Supreme Court of India, he assured that the government remains committed to preventing discrimination and will act in line with constitutional provisions once the court delivers its direction.

Speaking at a summit in New Delhi, Pradhan acknowledged that the disputes around the University Grants Commission (UGC) equity regulations and a National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) textbook could have been handled better.

The UGC’s 2026 equity regulations, designed to prevent discrimination against SC, ST, and OBC students, have been stayed by the Supreme Court of India following concerns over ambiguity and fairness.

Separately, NCERT withdrew a Class 8 social science textbook after criticism over a chapter discussing judicial corruption. The council also issued a public apology earlier this month.

What the minister said

Pradhan stated that while the issues were “avoidable”, the government remains committed to ensuring non-discrimination.

He emphasised that the matter is currently under the Supreme Court’s consideration, and the government will act in accordance with constitutional provisions once a legal framework is finalised.

NCERT textbook row

On the textbook controversy, Pradhan confirmed that corrective steps are underway under court supervision.

A three-member committee led by Justice Indu Malhotra has been formed to oversee the inclusion of a revised chapter. The panel also includes a former Attorney General of India and an education expert.

The new chapter will be submitted to the court before being incorporated into the curriculum.

The twin controversies highlight the sensitivity around education policy and curriculum in India, particularly on issues of social equity and institutional integrity.

With both matters under judicial scrutiny, the final outcome is likely to influence how educational reforms are framed and implemented, balancing inclusivity with legal and constitutional safeguards.
(With PTI inputs)