Why was Jimmy Lai convicted? The media tycoon who became a fierce critic of Beijing

# News Desk
File Photo: Media tycoon Jimmy Lai | AFP
File Photo: Media tycoon Jimmy Lai | AFP

Hong Kong: A Hong Kong tribunal on Monday convicted pro-democracy publisher Jimmy Lai of national security violations, a ruling that has intensified global alarm regarding the erosion of political liberties in the territory.

The Charges and Convictions

Lai was found guilty of two counts of conspiracy to commit foreign collusion under the 2020 national security law, a statute enacted by Beijing following the massive and occasionally violent pro-democracy demonstrations in the city. Conviction on these charges can carry a penalty of life imprisonment.

Judges described Lai as the central figure in two separate plots to solicit international powers to implement "sanctions or blockade" and carry out "hostile activities" against the governments of China and Hong Kong.

The 78-year-old creator of the shuttered Apple Daily newspaper was further convicted of "conspiracy to publish seditious publications." Prosecutors presented 161 pieces of evidence, including editorials written by Lai, arguing they were intended to "excited disaffection" against the administration. This colonial-era offence carries a maximum two-year prison term for a first-time conviction.

Detention and Trial History

Lai was initially apprehended under the security legislation in August 2020, shortly after its implementation. While he briefly secured bail, he was returned to custody on Dec. 31, 2020, and has remained incarcerated since.

In 2021, Hong Kong’s highest court significantly narrowed the criteria for bail in national security cases, ensuring Lai’s continued pre-trial detention. Though originally slated for late 2022, the trial was delayed after local authorities requested Beijing’s intervention to prevent Lai’s British counsel, Tim Owen, from representing him. The proceedings eventually commenced on Dec. 18, 2023, lasting approximately 150 days.

Officials confirmed Lai has been held in solitary confinement, but maintained this arrangement was at his own request. His children, Sebastien and Claire, recently expressed grave concerns regarding his physical state, noting visible weight loss and deterioration of his nails and teeth. The Hong Kong government has disputed these claims, stating Lai receives "adequate and comprehensive" medical care.

Trial Proceedings and Defence

The trial involved extensive scrutiny of articles and broadcast footage, alongside testimony from various witnesses and Lai himself. Prosecutors alleged Lai collaborated with senior Apple Daily management—six of whom were originally co-defendants—to utilise the media outlet as a platform for sanction requests.

Numerous international and local political figures, such as former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, were identified by the prosecution as Lai’s "agents," "collaborators," or "intermediaries." Lai was also accused of being the primary funder and leader of the lobbying group "Stand With Hong Kong, Fight for Freedom" (SWHK).

During his 52 days of testimony, Lai countered that he "never" attempted to use his foreign connections to manipulate international policy toward China or Hong Kong. Observers noted he answered questions with confidence and speed, though he was reprimanded by the three-judge panel for identifying as a "political prisoner." Lai told the court that his early warnings about the security law’s impact on civil liberties had "come to pass."

Post-Verdict Outlook

On Monday, High Court Judges Esther Toh, Alex Lee, and Susana D'Almada Remedios delivered guilty verdicts on all three counts. The conviction of Lai, who holds British citizenship, is expected to become a major point of tension between Beijing and Western governments, including the United Kingdom and the United States.

Sentencing will be scheduled for a future date following additional legal arguments. While the court may request medical reports to inform the sentencing, Lai retains the right to appeal. His lead defence lawyer, Robert Pang, stated the team would study the judgment before determining their next steps.

With inputs from PTI