‘Why just Sindh? Take the whole of Pakistan’: Rashid Alvi hits back at Rajnath Singh’s remark

New Delhi: Congress leader Rashid Alvi strongly criticised Defence Minister Rajnath Singh’s remarks about Sindh, arguing that if the RSS leadership claims that Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan were once part of India, then there is no reason to limit the conversation to Sindh alone.

Speaking to ANI, Alvi said that if such historical assertions are to be invoked, they should cover the entire region that the RSS frequently references.

Rajnath Singh’s remark that triggered the debate

The political exchange began after Rajnath Singh, while invoking a statement by former deputy prime minister Lal Krishna Advani, said that borders can change and that “tomorrow Sindh may return to India again”. The comment immediately prompted responses from the Opposition, sparking debate on the use of historical references in current political discourse. Singh also underlined the cultural roots of the Sindh region, noting its significance in the Indus Valley Civilisation and its importance to Sindhi communities.

Congress leader accuses BJP of diverting public attention

In his statement, Alvi alleged that such comments distract from pressing national issues including inflation, unemployment and economic distress. He argued that provocative political statements raise regional tensions instead of addressing public concerns. According to Alvi, these remarks by BJP leaders and ideological affiliates mislead the public and inflame sentiments at a time when political focus should remain on governance and economic priorities.

Historical and cultural angle behind the Sindh reference

The Sindh region carries deep civilisational relevance, historically linked to ancient Indian culture and often referenced in discussions about pre-Partition geography. Sindh became part of Pakistan after the 1947 partition. Rajnath Singh also referenced past beliefs among parts of the Sindhi Muslim community, stating that many believed the waters of the Indus were as sacred as the Aab-e-Zamzam of Mecca. While these cultural references highlight shared heritage, they have also become politically sensitive in modern diplomatic contexts.

Broader political implications and regional sensitivity

Alvi’s remarks have amplified ongoing political disagreements over the use of historical claims in contemporary politics. His comments have contributed to a larger debate on the narratives promoted by the BJP and the RSS, especially those touching on territorial claims, national identity and relations with neighbouring countries. The exchange has also renewed questions about the political purpose of such remarks at a time when both domestic and regional stability remain important national concerns.
(With ANI inputs)