Why did transfer of temple elephant to Ambani-run Vantara spark outrage?

The relocation of a temple elephant named Mahadevi—also known as Madhuri—from the Nandani Mutt in Kolhapur, Maharashtra, to the Vantara animal rescue centre in Gujarat has sparked widespread anger among the Jain community in Maharashtra and Karnataka. According to reports from Deccan Herald, The New Indian Express, among others, many are protesting the decision, calling it a deep insult to religious beliefs.
The Vantara centre, a newly launched facility in Jamnagar for rescued wildlife, is operated by Anant Ambani and was inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Though the move followed a court order prompted by a petition from PETA India, many Jains are questioning the decision, particularly the choice to relocate the elephant to a private facility rather than a government-run sanctuary.
Loved, worshipped and now relocated
Mahadevi had been part of the Nandani Mutt since 1992 and was considered sacred by locals. Reports say she was loved, worshipped and treated as part of the community’s spiritual life. Her departure triggered emotional scenes, with video footage showing the mutt’s head seer in tears as the elephant was taken away.
Reports state the elephant was relocated after concerns were raised by PETA about her physical and mental well-being. At 36 years old, Mahadevi reportedly suffered from arthritis and a painful foot condition, and had a history of aggressive behaviour, including allegedly killing the chief Swamiji of the mutt. These issues prompted a high-powered committee to recommend her relocation to the Vantara centre—a decision upheld by both the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court.
Campaign to bring her back gains momentum
Despite the legal backing, opposition to the move is growing. Protests are being planned in Karnataka’s Hubballi and Belagavi, while Jain religious leaders are preparing to escalate the matter nationally. According to reports, more than 1.25 lakh signatures have been collected within 24 hours demanding Mahadevi’s return to Kolhapur. These forms are expected to be sent to the President’s office. Similarly, protestors plan to petition Prime Minister Narendra Modi, urging his intervention.
Jain leaders argue that instead of relocating the elephant to a private trust, authorities could have worked with the mutt to improve conditions locally.
A cultural and spiritual flashpoint
While PETA maintains that the relocation was vital for the elephant’s welfare, many in the Jain community view the move as part of a larger trend of marginalisation. Reports highlight that similar sentiments were expressed earlier during disputes over the Girnar shrine in Gujarat.
As a conciliatory gesture, the Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations has offered a mechanical elephant to the mutt. But for the community, Mahadevi’s removal is more than a legal matter—it’s a spiritual loss they are unwilling to accept.