Temple elephant row: Amid flak,Vantara issues statement, video on transfer and Madhuri's condition

Amid mounting public outrage and emotional appeals, Vantara on Saturday released an official statement and a video detailing the circumstances and reasoning behind the relocation of the temple elephant Mahadevi—also known as Madhuri—from Kolhapur’s Jain mutt to its wildlife care facility in Gujarat.

Vantara stressed that the move was not initiated by them but carried out solely in compliance with binding orders issued by the Honourable Bombay High Court, which were later upheld by the Supreme Court. “We acted in the best interest of Madhuri’s health and long-term welfare,” the statement read, adding that the transition was undertaken with “love, responsibility, and complete adherence to both legal and welfare standards.”

The accompanying video explained the medical and psychological benefits of the move for Mahadevi, whose condition, they stated, required specialised care. Vantara reiterated its commitment to compassion, legality, and transparency, and expressed deep respect for the spiritual sentiments of the community. In a gesture of goodwill, the organisation confirmed it has opened a direct dialogue with the Jain Mutt and the head Swamiji to explore possible resolutions under legal and veterinary guidance.

Sacred elephant’s departure sparks emotional backlash

The elephant had been part of the Nandani Mutt in Kolhapur since 1992 and was deeply revered by the Jain community. Widely regarded as sacred, Mahadevi’s departure evoked emotional scenes, with footage showing the head seer of the mutt in tears. Her central place in the community’s religious life made the relocation particularly painful for many devotees.

According to reports, the relocation followed a petition from PETA India raising concerns over her health. At 36, Mahadevi reportedly suffered from arthritis, a painful foot condition, and had a history of aggressive behaviour, including allegedly killing the mutt’s former chief Swamiji. A Supreme Court–appointed High-Powered Committee reviewed her case and recommended her transfer, which the Bombay High Court upheld on July 16, 2025.

Protests intensify across states

Despite the legal framework supporting the move, opposition continues to grow. Reports say that over 1.25 lakh signatures demanding Mahadevi’s return were collected within 24 hours, with campaigners planning to send the petitions to the President’s office. Jain leaders are also preparing to appeal directly to Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

In Karnataka, protests are reportedly being planned in Hubballi and Belagavi. 

A deeper divide over faith and welfare

While PETA defends the move as necessary for Mahadevi’s wellbeing, Jain community leaders argue that the government should have considered upgrading facilities at the mutt instead of transferring the elephant to a private trust. They see the action as part of a broader pattern of religious marginalisation, echoing similar sentiments voiced during past disputes over the Girnar shrine in Gujarat.

As a conciliatory measure, the Federation of Indian Animal Protection Organisations has offered to gift the mutt a mechanical elephant. But for many in the community, the issue remains spiritual rather than logistical—Mahadevi’s presence was irreplaceable.

Vantara concludes its statement with an appeal for unity and compassion: “We invite the public to stand with us, not in conflict, but in care, for Madhuri and every animal who deserves a life of dignity and peace.”