'Phule' movie controversy: Was the release postponed for offending Brahmin community?
The biographical Hindi film Phule, starring Pratik Gandhi and Patralekhaa, has landed in the middle of a political and cultural storm. Directed by Ananth Mahadevan, the film, originally slated to hit cinemas on 11 April 2025, has now been delayed by two weeks. Its new release date is 25 April 2025. The delay follows objections from several Brahmin organisations, who have raised concerns about their portrayal in the film, claiming it incites caste divisions.
Why the controversy?
The film chronicles the life and work of social reformers Jyotirao Phule and Savitribai Phule, known for their efforts to eradicate caste and gender inequality in 19th-century India. However, after viewing the trailer, Anand Dave, President of the Brahmin Federation, accused the film of promoting casteism. He also called for the recognition of the so-called "black Brahmin" community, who he claims supported the Phules during their reform movements.
Following the backlash, Dave demanded a more inclusive portrayal that acknowledges the contributions of progressive Brahmins. In response, former state minister Chhagan Bhujbal met with director Mahadevan and the film’s producers to mediate the issue. Bhujbal later remarked, “This is a Hindi film based on the life of Mahatma Phule. It seems that the director and the rest of the group have put in a lot of hard work, hence this film should be seen by all, Mahatma is a great work, not only in the country but it should reach all over the world.”
CBFC intervenes
The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), which had initially cleared the film with a 'U' certificate, later demanded multiple changes to the final cut. These included the removal of a voiceover referencing the caste system, and the exclusion of historically sensitive terms such as 'Mahar', 'Mang', 'Peshwai', and the 'Manus system of caste'. Additionally, several dialogues were revised to ensure suitability for a general audience.
The filmmakers have since submitted historical documentation to validate the claims presented in the film. Mahadevan also held discussions with members of the Brahmin community to clarify that certain Brahmins had indeed supported Jyotirao Phule’s initiatives, including the founding of 20 schools and the Satyashodhak Samaj. He asserted that the film is grounded in historical truth and not guided by any ideological agenda.
Director defends the film
Amid growing scrutiny, Mahadevan responded to the controversy in an interview with News18, stating: “We don't get into a film with these kinds of doubts and fears in mind... You don't deserve to make the movie if you're going to carry such fear when discussing a fearless couple like Jyotiba and Savitribai.”
He maintained that he aimed to remain faithful to historical accuracy rather than exaggerate for dramatic effect. “You don't even need to take any cinematic liberties because their lives have been so dramatic; you can just be honest, stick to the facts, do your research, and avoid exaggeration or making it seem unrealistic in any way,” he said. “Actually, because it's so dramatic, you have to downplay a lot of things!”
Mahadevan also acknowledged his own caste identity, saying, “I'm a Brahmin myself. Naturally, I will first ask myself if I'm doing the right thing if I have to make a movie about caste differences... The doctor would care about his patients' well-being.”
The director concluded by reaffirming the ongoing relevance of the Phules’ work. He noted that despite strides in women’s education and empowerment, caste and gender discrimination remain persistent in various parts of India. “Unfortunately, what Jyotiba and Savitribai began in the middle of the 1800s still holds true today... Because people's mindsets need to shift, it will take time. Furthermore, I don't believe that things are getting better,” he said.