Lawyer of actor Dileep welcomes SC order on dismissing survivor's plea to change trial court

2 min read
Read later

B Raman Pillai | Photo: Mathrubhumi

Kochi: Noted criminal lawyer B Raman Pillai, who is appearing for actor Dileep, an accused in the sensational actress assault case of 2017, on Friday welcomed the Supreme Court order dismissing a plea moved by the survivor in the case seeking to transfer the trial to another lower court.

Reacting to the apex court order, Pillai said the plea to transfer the case to another lower court was an attempt to further delay the trial in the case.

In her plea, the survivor had alleged that Dileep, the eighth accused in the case, had close ties with the trial judge and her husband.

The Supreme Court today dismissed the plea, observing that the Kerala High Court had already decided the issue of bias in its judgment.

"This was just an attempt to delay the trial in the case. That matter was already decided by the Kerala High Court," Pillai told PTI.

Meanwhile, a prosecutor who is associated with the case told PTI that they accept the apex court's order.

"We accept the court's order. After the additional charges were filed recently, the trial court has been considering the arguments of the prosecution," the lawyer said.

The survivor had moved the Supreme Court after the high court dismissed her plea on the matter.

Rejecting the petitioner's contentions, the high court, in its September 22 order, had said it was of the firm view that her apprehensions regarding a possible interference in a fair trial were not reasonable.

"Possibly, the frequent discussions and debates conducted and being conducted by various news channels in connection with this case for several days and months created some wrong perceptions about the trial of the case, and it apparently influenced the general public at large, including the petitioner," the high court had said.

"Though I do find that this petition is submitted by the petitioner with all bona fides, I have all the reasons to assume that she is a victim of such wrong perceptions and aspersions created by the media," it had said.

The petitioner had contended that she would not get justice if the lower court was not changed and that the trial would not be fair.

Incidentally, it was on the survivor's plea that the high court had, in 2018, set up a special court with a woman judge for the trial that had commenced in 2020.

The survivor, in her plea, had also alleged that there were several instances where the special public prosecutor was unable to proceed with the trial and that there were repeated and persistent attempts on Dileep's part to influence and intimidate the witnesses.

She had said when the judge was transferred from a particular court as the principal sessions judge, the case was also transferred to her court and claimed that the transfer of the case by an administrative order was not legal.

The survivor, an actress who has worked in Tamil and Telugu films, was allegedly abducted and molested inside her car for two hours by the accused, who had forced their way into the vehicle on the night of February 17, 2017 and later, escaped in a busy area.

The entire act was filmed by the accused to blackmail the actress, according to the prosecution. There are 10 accused in the case.


Add Comment
Related Topics

Get daily updates from

Disclaimer: Kindly avoid objectionable, derogatory, unlawful and lewd comments, while responding to reports. Such comments are punishable under cyber laws. Please keep away from personal attacks. The opinions expressed here are the personal opinions of readers and not that of Mathrubhumi.